This article takes an awful lot of words to say not much, and it is entirely speculative on any of the details of the alleged syllabus revamp, as "The U.S. Navy has stayed tight-lipped about the specifics of its new Lightning II syllabus".

Every comment about the content of the syllabus is speculative: >"Other changes the F-35C is likely to bring to the existing TOPGUN course include.." >"It’s very possible that TOPGUN has introduced tactics that.." >"The long-range BVR engagements are likely to be where the biggest changes have come.." >"The length of the course suggests that the F-35C syllabus likely follows that of the Super Hornet in terms of core elements.."

All it is really saying is:

TOPGUN has graduated its first two F-35C pilots. Under current structures, these pilots will return to their units, and likely share some of what they've learned. Their training was likely based on the existing Super Hornet training but redeveloped to suit the F-35C, which serves a different combat role.

The rest reads like some bastard child of an undergraduate essay and attempts at SEO.

I resent that so much of the web has become this amplification of an ounce of signal into a ton of noise.