Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons for the Istio project

Re:Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons fo... by BossingAround on Thursday July 09, 2020 @12:07PM (#23781703)

> The problem with CNCF and why istio was not transferred to that org is that CNCF acts as a mediator, so any decision around trademark takes soo much time and effort because CNCF has to get the blessing of everyone or build something neutral (like the k8s certification), and it's in their best interest that things are complicated as they can make money out of that.

This is a cynical point of view. At this point, Istio takes advantage of a number of IBM, Oracle, Lyft and Red Hat developers while not giving them any governance over it..?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons fo... by sg1234 on Thursday July 09, 2020 @05:49PM (#23785638)

Valid point, and that's the balance i think OUC is trying to bring, not being as un-flexible as CNCF and trying to be as open to the community as possible. Again OUC is about the trademark and not the licensing of the software which is what contributors and maintainers should care about in my opinion.

[ Parent | on HN ]