News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons for the Istio project. Parent comment

Re:Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons fo... by Andrex on Thursday July 09, 2020 @10:34AM (#23780698)
> better at abusing their current dominant position (hehe it sucks doesn't Goog ? heh? Doesn't it ?)

Just wanted to say this one weirdly petty/obnoxious concluding line tainted an otherwise solid comment. Seems unnecessary.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons fo... by solarkraft on Thursday July 09, 2020 @11:25AM (#23781257)
I don't see why. It's funny, based on facts and doesn't imply a clear bias (very different from something like "and btw Google are assholes").
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons fo... by ocdtrekkie on Thursday July 09, 2020 @10:53AM (#23780926)
It's incredibly accurate though. One human remark shouldn't ruin a comment full of substance for you. This isn't a Reddit comment, it's an HN response with a tail of humanity.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why IBM doesn’t agree with Google’s Open Usage Commons fo... by manigandham on Sunday July 12, 2020 @07:24PM (#23815593)
That's exactly how it is in adtech where Google dictates everything to the rest of the industry.
[ Parent | on HN ]