I know it's easy to throw around "force", but in the end, one lives in a democratic country.
Also, I think it's fine to argue against the current state of laws. It's not as if we are actually a democracy (at the federal level, the founding fathers didn't give us any direct democracy tools and those who could vote were an elite subset of the population). Even today we suffer from bad laws drafted by special interests and voted into existence by those who accept campaign contributions from those who drafted the laws.
There is little in the form of "direct democracy" in our current system of legislation.
I have been reading up on these people and the belief is that only those who oppose welfare and taxation are morally OK to take it.
I will stop pointing out the astounding hypocrisy of the Randites when they accept that collective security is better than every dog for itself.