News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:H.266/Versatile Video Coding (VVC) by speedgoose on Monday July 06, 2020 @10:30AM (#23748262)
One more benefit of the brexit for mainland Europe! I didn't know about using the WTO to dispute invalide patents. I guess a WTO dispute can make sense for a Boeing software patent used by Airbus. I wonder whether the WTO would care about an independent developer. It's not very good press, but perhaps it's fine for them.
Re:H.266/Versatile Video Coding (VVC) by p_l on Monday July 06, 2020 @10:33AM (#23748288)
WTO doesn't care, WTO serves as a forum to get it through.

The question is, does a "practicing entity" holding the patent cares enough to go through the hardest route to get the patent executed using WTO as a forum? One needs to compare costs and benefits. It's why patent trolling involved pretty much few counties in Texas, because that's where the costs were lowest compared to benefits.

Re:H.266/Versatile Video Coding (VVC) by makomk on Monday July 06, 2020 @12:53PM (#23749791)
It's not just the UK that allows software patents in practice - as the discussion hints at, Germany does too, and if I remember rightly pretty much the last patent affecting MP3 was a German patent on zero-padding held by Philips, who enforced it aggressively against manufacturers of devices like music players.