News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dutch national broadcaster saw ad revenue rise when it st... by daneel_w on Monday July 06, 2020 @07:30AM (#23746764)
Why does the NPO, the Dutch equivalent to the PBS, even run commercial advertisements? Aren't they funded by the people's taxes?
Re:Dutch national broadcaster saw ad revenue rise when it st... by polytely on Monday July 06, 2020 @07:59AM (#23746963)
Wikipedia tells me it's mainly funded by tax money 800 millions euros, coming up to about 45 euro per Dutch citizen, with supplemental income from ads (200 million),

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_public_broadcasting_syst...

Re:Dutch national broadcaster saw ad revenue rise when it st... by fr2null on Monday July 06, 2020 @10:40AM (#23748381)
They are partly funded by people's taxes. Commercials have more restrictions on them than on non-public channels. A maximum of 10% of airtime can be a commercial (on a yearly basis), with a 15% max per day. Commercials can only be before or after a program, not within. And just like commercial channels, you cannot sponsor news programs.

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/media-en-publieke-o...

Re:Dutch national broadcaster saw ad revenue rise when it st... by mcv on Tuesday July 07, 2020 @08:30AM (#23758477)
Yes, but the government doesn't want to spend too much tax money on it, so it operates semi-commercially. I'd rather they cut commercials, cut one of the three channels, and focus on content that the commercial channels can't or won't broadcast with the same level of quality.
Re:Dutch national broadcaster saw ad revenue rise when it st... by timwaagh on Monday July 06, 2020 @10:41AM (#23748388)
because otherwise we'd pay ourselves blue.
Re:Dutch national broadcaster saw ad revenue rise when it st... by daneel_w on Monday July 06, 2020 @10:54AM (#23748559)
With 17 million citizens I think that's unlikely.