News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The CSS Standardization Process by onion2k on Sunday July 05, 2020 @11:52AM (#23739582)
Yet, it is also not very difficult to specify how it should properly work.

Should a footer align to the bottom of the content or the viewport or should it be sticky? Should I be able to continue content after the footer? What happens if I have a second footer element? Should the footer create a new section in the document outline? Should it display inline or as a block element? What should be the default behaviour if I print a page with a footer? Is the footer of a document the same as a footer on a website, and is that the same as the footer on a web app?

These are easy questions I can think of in 30 seconds. No doubt there are some much more complex issues too. The idea that defining a footer element for HTML is easy is nonsense.

As it is, HTML5 has had a <footer> tag for years, and it doesn't do what a document footer does. HTML5 added <header>, <main>, <section>, <aside> and more. None of them do what TeX does.

Re:The CSS Standardization Process by amelius on Sunday July 05, 2020 @12:33PM (#23739894)
> Should ...

I just wish the CSS committee asked themselves these questions ... Like I said, it's more involved than you would expect, but on the other hand it's not rocket science, really.