News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Founder-driven life sciences companies by neilv on Saturday July 04, 2020 @08:22PM (#23735803)
I think "move fast, and break things" isn't as catchy, when it's harder to ignore that "things" being broken are often people.
Re:Founder-driven life sciences companies by jamestimmins on Saturday July 04, 2020 @08:40PM (#23735863)
Yeah "move fast and kill people" doesn't have the same ring to it
Re:Founder-driven life sciences companies by somurzakov on Saturday July 04, 2020 @10:36PM (#23736240)
modern pharma R&D is pretty much move fast and break things. All modern pharma firms spend enourmous effort to ensuring that errors are cought as early as possible (shift left) in R&D. Hundreds of molecule candidates are discarded before reaching Phase 3 trials
Re:Founder-driven life sciences companies by Eridrus on Sunday July 05, 2020 @08:47AM (#23738274)
Most of the cost in pharma trials is not due to safety testing, it is in testing whether it is effective and whether it is better than the competition.

I'm not really involved in pharma, but there seems to be a decent argument for selling the drug with provisional approval after safety has been established and collecting outcomes data for those who use provisional drugs https://reason.com/2018/02/02/right-to-try-fda-drug-trials/

Re:Founder-driven life sciences companies by est31 on Saturday July 04, 2020 @08:28PM (#23735829)
Spot on.