News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Where Am I? NYTimes or Google? by nxnews on Saturday July 04, 2020 @02:53AM (#23730642)
Why would it be amazing for decentralized networks and offline web apps?
Re:Where Am I? NYTimes or Google? by remexre on Saturday July 04, 2020 @03:02AM (#23730667)
If I publish mycoolthing.com/thing, it could be mirrored over a P2P network as peer1.com/rehosted/mycoolthing.com/thing, peer2.com/rehosted/mycoolthing.com/thing, etc., in a way that would make it evident to end-users not familiar with the protocol that the content is from mycoolthing.com.
Re:Where Am I? NYTimes or Google? by tgv on Saturday July 04, 2020 @03:32AM (#23730780)
AMP is of course not P2P.
Re:Where Am I? NYTimes or Google? by tyingq on Saturday July 04, 2020 @12:16PM (#23733239)
I think the point is that signed exchanges ( https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/11/signed-exc...) could potentially be useful, if separated from AMP, and made an actually secure thing. Like, for example, the spec doesn't require specific Google controlled js URLS to be in the content.
Re:Where Am I? NYTimes or Google? by gregable on Saturday July 04, 2020 @08:42PM (#23735873)
Signed exchanges is actually separate spec from AMP. The browser implements it independently. There is no requirement for AMP pages to use signed exchanges nor for signed exchanges to be AMP.