RRO based off us/common practice but Congress, Senate and the House of Commons do a lot a "naughty shit" that are outside RRO / Citrine.
Amending a motion with non related things should really be ruled out of order.
The "naughty shit" is a direct quote from a former whip.
Might be similar for UK Parliament.
But you guys have the most downright entertaining government in the world.
It is online at https://erskinemay.parliament.uk/
But the executive has far to much power in the UK in my opinion - you can see why thye went after John Bercow as he was pushing back.
The US House of Representatives uses a set of rules based on Jefferson's Manual. Bill flow is a bit different than Roberts Rules of Order, but the concepts are very similar.
Been awhile since I read it. It’s not light reading.
Also, most folks use modern versions (copyrighted, so not open-sourced) of RRO.
It's pretty damn complete. It's actually a multi-hour class.
If I missed anyone, let me know.
It is far from perfect, but I feel it works.
I have been in many RRO meetings, and a few "CBDM" meetings.
I worked for a Japanese corporation for a long time, and saw their consensus system, which was painful, but worked. It was completely different from the "CBDM" meetings I've attended.
I once wrote up a very complete presentation and paper on real CBDM, but no one was ever interested in learning about it.
In my experience, most CBDM meetings aren't actually designed for "consensus." They are designed to let "the people that matter" accelerate the process of getting what they want.