Re:The U.S. can now set its own rates for mail from China an...
by Fjolsvith on Thursday July 02, 2020 @12:32AM
(#23710035)
Wow, that was a big departure from sunglasses, for which my argument holds, and obviously cannot be refuted by you.
Edit: And, you can go and do all those things you mentioned. And my argument holds. There are consequences, though...
Re:The U.S. can now set its own rates for mail from China an...
by flattone on Thursday July 02, 2020 @01:07PM
(#23715370)
Ok. Please talk to me like I am the student.
- where did your argument suceed? - where i say 'this deceptive' transaction is not good for society. I agree this is subjective. - I present a wildly inflated case, based on your criteria 'seller buyer agree' to present that this formula would not lead to a good world, destruction/chaos, self endangerment. - I believe our disconnect is not where we fail to align argument paths but backing up, where we fail to agree on a definition of what is 'good'. Would you like to take the lead?
Appreciate your time!
And no joke this activity sounds awesome