In what world? If that were true why cant i go buy automatic machine guns, lsd, and drive counterfeit ferraris with rock climbing suspension down snow covered ski areas while shooting at the sky, assuming me and the sellers agree to the deal.... because we are trying to not live in todays version of a game of thrones world.

And no joke this activity sounds awesome

Wow, that was a big departure from sunglasses, for which my argument holds, and obviously cannot be refuted by you.

Edit: And, you can go and do all those things you mentioned. And my argument holds. There are consequences, though...

Ok. Please talk to me like I am the student.

- where did your argument suceed? - where i say 'this deceptive' transaction is not good for society. I agree this is subjective. - I present a wildly inflated case, based on your criteria 'seller buyer agree' to present that this formula would not lead to a good world, destruction/chaos, self endangerment. - I believe our disconnect is not where we fail to align argument paths but backing up, where we fail to agree on a definition of what is 'good'. Would you like to take the lead?

Appreciate your time!