News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oppose the Earn IT Act by glenda on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @01:57PM (#23704412)
Exactly, we need way more political parties with direct representation. However, power seems to do a great job of consolidating itself so that won't be an easy task.
Re:Oppose the Earn IT Act by ericd on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @02:06PM (#23704523)
First past the post voting tends toward a two party system, because there are strong incentives for smaller parties to consolidate to get to a majority.
Re:Oppose the Earn IT Act by nitrogen on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @02:12PM (#23704601)
Since this is a subject I find fascinating, I'll add this link that I first encountered here on HN long ago: http://zesty.ca/voting/sim/

It's a mathematical model and accompanying explanation that shows that simple plurality (first past the post) voting produces bi-polarization, while other voting methods like approval voting do not. It also shows that the instant-runoff voting method that people are trying to replace FPTP with is non-monotonic, meaning that gaining a few points of support can actually hurt a candidate.

Re:Oppose the Earn IT Act by smichel17 on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @03:37PM (#23705551)
I don't like that this page links to Arrow's impossibility theorem, because it's kind of misleading. https://rangevoting.org/ArrowThm.html
Re:Oppose the Earn IT Act by ericd on Thursday July 02, 2020 @12:01AM (#23709876)
Neat link, thanks!