Political left was unpopular with the previous centrist government and with this one. But this one is especially intolerant to dissent. Prominent Dalit scholars and activists have been arrested because they "promote enmity between caste groups". Because surely asking for rights for the historically marginalized is 'promoting enmity'. The grassroots left movements are one of the biggest threats to caste politics and current establishment. Unfortunately, it currently doesn't have wide enough traction to change government policies.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-natio... https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/sudha-bh...
An "Activist" however is not a peoples representative. In a democratic country, you stand for elections to become a peoples representative.
These "activists" are instead involved in armed violence with the democratic state.If they did that in 1950 fine, there is some justification but not in 2020.
I would call them terrorists, mafia or fascists - the Indian word is Naxal/Urban Naxal.
Democracy is not perfect, but I am not buying the promises of insanely wealthy self proclaimed activists who have enough money & resources to run armed conflicts and hire the best lawyer, but somehow never win in the elections.
Pray enlighten the rest of us as to how the current regime favouring one particular corporation isn't fascism?
Where is this definition of "urban naxal" defined? Just because one thought so? If speaking against the atrocities of authorities is being "urban naxalism", most of the current leaders also did so, during the emergency in India. Is there a Retired/Erstwhile "Urban Naxal" title too, for them?
Please keep HN civil. Your ultra-right thoughts can find good currency on Twitter/Reddit.
HN being invaded by ultra-right, on a thread that talks about caste-based discrimination.
Guess it is enough Internet for one day!
India has been democratic for more than 70 years. I say picking up guns to disrupt civil society with an intent to capture power through violence is not Activism.
That is the recipe of fascism.
And "emergency" is by definition a suspension of democracy.
Participatory democracy doesn't mean that responsibility ends the moment one gets off the voting booth. In fact, the resposibility starts right there, by casting the vote, to ensure that the representative works for the benefit of people.
Us Indians just find the latter part, of dealing with that responsibility, a lot harder, and just convince ourselves otherwise.
And anyone else would get termed "activist" "leftist".
Left => left nothing. Left out off the mainstream (development, benefits, facilities), for being contrarian.
Not left as in left hand side.
All parties are somewhat socialist because India is a poor country.
The current government is hard right, its founders were inspired by Nazi Germany and the media landscape today resembles radio rwanda.
The new progressive India that you see does not have a real right, because it is mostly still a poor country. Nevertheless it has moved closer to the free market, trying to cut down government interference if not for anything but corruption by the erstwhile leftists.
The extreme left consists of elitists, close knit extended family of the ruling powers. In fact even today much of India's media and who is who political influencers consist of people who attended the same elitist schools in Delhi.
Ironically, they still have not come to terms with a tea seller becoming the Prime minister, so they keep running smear campaigns against him both inside and outside the country.