News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How well do cars do in crash tests they're not optimized ... by ghaff on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @02:42PM (#23693318)
I assume it means "per million hours of living." (Though I guess it could be "per million hours of living in a residence")
Re:How well do cars do in crash tests they're not optimized ... by jhardy54 on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @03:28PM (#23693834)
The problem with the unqualified "per million hours of living" is that sky diving doesn't kill more people than passenger cars.

It must be "fatalities from X during Y", and that makes sense when X and Y are the same thing (e.g. sky diving), but it seems like X and Y diverge in some of these entries.

Re:How well do cars do in crash tests they're not optimized ... by ghaff on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @03:41PM (#23693953)
Though even skydiving has a very different time/risk profile than, say, mountain climbing (however you care to define). If skydiving time is measured only by time from leaving the plane to hitting the ground, you're measuring a fatality rate against a pretty short interval of time. (Same with scuba diving.)

Whereas other activities that may have similar risk profiles for typical "active participants" may have much different rates relative to the time spent actively participating in the activity.

There's no single metric that really represents a correct view.