News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by Melting_Harps on Sunday June 28, 2020 @07:12PM (#23672776)
Biochar is very interesting topic I got introduced to by the son of a Biodynamic farmer I worked for in Schwaebisch Gmuend, he had done his last year of undergrad studies for his Ag degree in Africa to try and utilize this method to re-rehabilitate the soil by introducing micro-organisms alongside subsistence farmers. Biodynamics, after you remove the often over-emphasized 'woo-woo' aspect (which I personally enjoy, but can be off-putting to the uninitiated) of it from Steiner, is actually just really sound Microbiology and Astronomy.

The surface area you create via pyrolysis in organic matter to create the bio-char for microoragnisms is actually really impressive and a low cost way to maintain soil fertility.

Graham Hancock actually made the point in his book America Before [1], that Amazonian People actually cultivated the Amazon Forest as we would with Nature Preserves in National Forests. Its a pretty interesting perspective I never considered being from the West and took the Amazon for granted, but it makes sense when your way of life relies on Natural Paganism and Biodiversity the abundance of of wild-life to help feed your People.

1: https://www.amazon.com/America-Before-Earths-Lost-Civilizati...

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by jnwr on Sunday June 28, 2020 @08:27PM (#23673193)
A professor of mine first exposed me to biochar and its usage in creating Terra Preta[1]. It's fascinating. I think you are definitely correct in the 'woo-woo' assessment. But I know if people can get past that, talking about this is worthwhile. From what I know, biochar is a big component in making this terra preta soil, and you don't see it mentioned much outside certain circles. So I'm excited to see mention of it on HN.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by klyrs on Sunday June 28, 2020 @10:44PM (#23673889)
I've always wondered why this hasn't caught on (presuming it isn't all woo) -- it can't be that expensive to run a few large-scale tests at, say, an ag school's farms. Would modern farming practices defeat the purpose somehow?
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by danielheath on Sunday June 28, 2020 @10:55PM (#23673937)
One big limitation is that you can only capture the value created on your own farm, but not the downstream effects.

There are lots of “prisoners dilemma” food production methods where everyone is better off if nobody exploits (eg: salmon runs are not owned by anyone in particular, so maintaining them is a matter for underfunded parks departments, but properly maintained they produce astonishing amounts of delicious food).

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by igorkraw on Monday June 29, 2020 @03:04AM (#23675118)
How does astronomy factor into it?
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by LunaSea on Monday June 29, 2020 @03:06AM (#23675135)
I think that biochar is interesting but make no mistake, the astronomy side is pure pseudo-science at the same level as homeopathy.
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by fit2rule on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:00AM (#23675750)
It is not pseudo-science - it just hasn't been taken seriously by current _market_ leaders in the agricultural science market.

That is not the same as being a pseudo-science.

There are a lot of discoveries in agriculture that aren't taken seriously by mainstream researchers, because they work for market-dominating entities who can't profit when people start growing their own food gardens.

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by LunaSea on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:28AM (#23675863)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodynamic_agriculture#Recepti...

All research papers linked show that biodynamic agriculture is similar to alchemy.

Do you have scientific sources that show any advantages of biodynamic agriculture over regular biological agriculture?

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by fit2rule on Monday June 29, 2020 @06:21AM (#23676145)
Rigorous science requires a great deal of validation. Woo-woo 'energy fields' - okay, sure. But I don't think enough has been done on the subject of lunar cycles and plant health, and that's one of the issues I have with lumping all "biodynamic agriculture" under the same pretext.

I can say that what I've seen with my own eyes: crops which were planted during a full moon versus crops (from the same seedlings) going in a week later, is that the moon-crops were bigger, juicier, and more resilient to problems - this over multiple years, in my own personal garden, under the watchful eye of my own gardener, whose opinion I trust inherently ..

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by Fireflite on Monday June 29, 2020 @07:17AM (#23676455)
Yes, you'll often get better results by transplanting earlier. You're missing the inverse control though.

In the absence of a specific mechanism it seems very implausible that the full moon has a measurable positive effect on the plants.

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by fit2rule on Monday June 29, 2020 @07:24AM (#23676506)
I dunno about that. Plants evolved under the influence of the moon.
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by LunaSea on Monday June 29, 2020 @07:35AM (#23676588)
Thing is that the idea has merit if it has been proven in double blind scenarios with controls.

This is not the case here.

We might not know everything about biological processes in agriculture and all the variables that come into play, however that doesn't mean that any idea that isn't part of "mainstream" agriculture has merit on its own.

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by fit2rule on Monday June 29, 2020 @07:56AM (#23676717)
Mainstream isn't always as inclusive for things as it might want to be. There could be economic reasons for suppressing the biodynamic movement.

Agricultural-science is fraught with misdeed.

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by LunaSea on Monday June 29, 2020 @08:49AM (#23677091)
We live in an age of mass production, I wonder what company would try to block farmers from producing more.

Also, no company can stop independent farmers from starting a biodynamic farm and produce more than their competitors thus being able to have even better margins.

So I think we can safely classify those kinds of worries in the "conspiracy theory" until proven otherwise.

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by fit2rule on Monday June 29, 2020 @09:32AM (#23677388)
Oh, I think you're being specious if you really have an interest in this subject but can't name a single company that would try to block farmers producing more using techniques from which the company can't derive profit... But hey, if you want to use the old 'conspiracy theory' saw to end the discussion, fine with me.
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by LunaSea on Monday June 29, 2020 @11:31AM (#23678502)
Well you're making a claim regarding biodynamic agriculture but can't back it up.

When asked for sources you answer with obscure conspiracy theories which are again, not backed up.

I'm sorry but science it built on stronger principles than this.

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by waihtis on Monday June 29, 2020 @03:31AM (#23675325)
Google isn't yielding any good results - what has astronomy got to do with biochar?
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by patall on Monday June 29, 2020 @03:42AM (#23675396)
The comment is about Rudolf Steiner and the anthroposophic movement where many of the permaculture (but also a lot of lets say more questionable) ideas have been popular: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodynamic_agriculture
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by waihtis on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:13AM (#23675811)
Thanks! Reading through the approach it does seem esoteric part is quite limited to small things like the moon calendar and using "magic" fertilizers.. I wonder how widespread those approaches really are.
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by patall on Monday June 29, 2020 @12:40PM (#23679175)
They are quite widespread for one reason: certificates. Demeter is one of the oldest and most strict organic certificates and also probably the most powerful. If a farmer really wants to do sustainable agriculture, it makes sense to go for the demeter certificates as it is well known and generally one of the best paying. Unfortunately, to get it you have to take part in the stupid 'magic' to get it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demeter_International

(That and I really feel irritated when I go to an organic bakery and they also try to sell you energized water. On my last skiing trip they sold home made lemonade but with Grander water. I asked whether I could get it without and they told me that is not possible and why the hell would you opt-out if you do not believe in it. Didn't make it cheaper for me though, and they certaily pay quite a bit for that fraud.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Grander

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by waihtis on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @07:15AM (#23688912)
Ha, very interesting, had never heard of either Demeter or Grander.

Your lemonade experience may be an example of the "tyranny of minorities" :-)

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by LunaSea on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:44AM (#23675940)
It's the biodynamic agriculture is basically biological agriculture plus magic. No serious scientific research has been proven any merit to the ideas.
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by Melting_Harps on Monday June 29, 2020 @03:54PM (#23681866)
> The comment is about Rudolf Steiner and the anthroposophic movement where many of the permaculture (but also a lot of lets say more questionable) ideas have been popular: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodynamic_agriculture

I like how I no longer have to explain something like this entirely by myself on a VC based Technology forum: progress has been made to say the least!

Correct, this is about Anthroposophia, or much of what I regarded as 'woo' in my initial response. its mandatory reading and learning in Demeter certified Ag practices/apprenticeships. As a Biologist not only was I entirely skeptical, I sought out to disprove it all.

However, the chef in me just couldn't fathom why the products tasted so much better, so when Ipaid off my student debt I undertook a 2.5 year apprenticeship in Europe (mainly Germany were it has the most Demeter certified cultivated hectares in the World, despite it being an Austrian method) while I also worked and eventually ran Agro-tourism kitchens.

Its also worth noting that Waldorfschules/Steiner-schools are also tied to these practices and is part of the curriculum.

As for the validity, I'm a Cellular-Molecular Biologist, and I spent 3.5 years in a lab doing diagnostics specifically focused on Leukemia and Lymphoma.

Suffice it to say I know how to work in a laboratory setting and know how to create experimental designs. I conducted approximately 250 controlled experiments from all the farms I worked on (some just Bio/Organic and Permaculture as well as my Biodynamic ones in various countries) that mainly tested planting and weeding, the planting/seeding/transplanting yielded far more favorable results when I followed the lunar calendar then not.

Things like weeding and when to start a compost were not as objectively provable. Things like pest control, or water-hat things were not something I sough to test more than once after it didn't do anything noticeable. It felt very 'energy crystal' to me and I needed to focus my time on more pertinent matters as I was also running working in the farmer stands, CSA program, Kindergarten/special needs student garden programs as well as running Kitchens.

Suffice it to say, my time was often limited as an apprentice and I was spread very thin; so it wouldn't be until I managed a farm in Hawaii with completely different settings that I'd get to the watering aspect in earnest.

Specifically the aeration of water sources (turbulence/chaos) you use when making those preps and the water sources. This was later seen in the MJ industry and competitions for the largest height and canopy was often won by growers with not only the right genetics but had also used water aeration frequently into the root system. The methods have merit, but the 'woo' is what throws people off.

AThe preps used (502-507) are actually grounded in very sound Microbiology, all you are doing is re-introducing the flora/fauna found in the soil from the previous year into the top soil before planting an ideally crop rotated set of cultures into the prepared soil. Its the equivalent of probiotics for the soil and getting it ready to ensure the roots of the starter plants or seeds are starting off as best as possible.

Conventional farmers will argue NPK ratios are the holy grail, and a small number will even care about pH, but in doing so they negate not just the sustainability, but that of the depletion of the soils ability to recreate those nutrients themselves as seen in biodyanmics with having had ruminants graze the land prior to the planting season. A biodynamic farm, and to a much lesser degree permaculture, seek to find a balance in which external inputs are no longer needed and developing its own terroir and equilibrium with the output. In a Biodynamic farm its perhaps like one approaches a savings account, and the soil is the unit of currency, the more you put away the more you can draw from it and not have to worry about depleting it all in a single season. The soil or humous is often pitch black like coffee grunds and floral-herbal smelling, one apple orchard I spent some time in Switzerland had soil that honestly smelled of basil. Little did I know the farmer had spent over 25 years revamping those orchards, that yielded over 15 different cultivars he created himself, but had also spent over 3 million CHF to do it having taken it over from a conventional farmer. He had a wife, children, and several apprentices he regarded and his extended children, but that apple orchard was his Life's work.

This is a fundamental difference in why to this day the best tomato I have ever had wasn't in Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal or any other country you'd associate with tomato cultivation. Those from the Med countries were good, but it was in Southern Germany that had practiced Biodynamics for over 75 years is where I had the most complex and flavourful tomato in my entire Life. I was obviously biased as it was my own crop, but... to this day I still cannot say I've had one with so many layers of flavour it started off sweet, then went tart to sour, and then savoury and then back to sweet, it made you want to keep chewing and depending on the cultivar (we had 4 that year) it felt like you were eating a lean cut of meat. Its was no surprise most of our clientele at the farmers markets were vegetarians and vegans.

My journal was stolen (along with my luggage) on the Am-track on my way to help convert an Organic Farm to Biodynamic in Petaluma, so after having cried my eyes out about it I only have the notes I wrote down on my laptop from back then which is not as extensive as my journal was.

Honestly, I always just did a blind taste when I went to the farmers market: I'd line up our seasonal Biodynaimc product, alongside a conventional one I bought from the super market, and an organic one form the competitors and 85% of the time they always went from the Biodynamic one only judged on appearance and taste.

The price is always what made people not purchase it in the undecided people, mainly because it can be over 20% more than Organic. It is essentially the Rolls Royce of Food, and unless you're used to the price tag you usually get sticker shock if you're not used to it. Biodynamic wines sell well in the US, we had several at the Kitchen where I worked at and it always sold well. We choose local, organic meat and even though we have a restaurant/farm that's Biodynamic management chose to buy from an organic vendor.

It was good and sold well, I just hung out with one of my old teammates and they recently changed the entire menu selling more hooch-coture chefy inspired dishes then when I was there (Foie gras, lobster, tomahawk steaks etc...) so I can't speak of it until I sit down and eat and talk to chef about it. This is Kimbal's Flagship restaurant that he and Hugo not only opened together but used to work in themselves for a period so its the most prestigious of all and has been doing this kind of farm-to-table cuisine for over 16 years now.

Again, I can nerd about this and probably write a book on various topics as a farmer and a chef if allowed to do so, so unless anyone wants any specific questions answered other posters seem to have a good enough grasp of things that I really only need to fill in the gaps.

Still, its made my day to know not only that this much discussion takes place HERE about these topics, but that people seem genuinely interested, albeit skeptical (which I personally encourage as it was my position, too) about these practices.

I honestly think it proves we in the Community and Movement won this battle and critical mass is now emerging.

Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by samvher on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:51AM (#23675978)
I highly recommend the book "1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus" by Charles Mann which among others goes into this topic as well. It really changed my conceptions about ancient civilizations in the Americas.
Re:Innovation by ancient farmers adds to biodiversity of the... by spiderfarmer on Monday June 29, 2020 @07:44AM (#23676639)
I put all the ashes from my wood stove in the winter on my vegetable garden and fruit trees. The ash is rich in calcium, potash, minerals and trace elements. I only avoid using it on the potatoes, the calcium provides a thicker skin, which I don't like.