News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New York Times developers squabble over decision to doxx ... by aspenmayer on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:37AM (#23649026)
Do posts mentioning HN make anyone else feel like they’re in on the joke, in a way? I get the same feeling when a movie title is mentioned in the movie. It just feels nice.

> The Slate Star Codex incident set off a tense conversation in the Times’ “newsroom-feedback” Slack channel, an internal message board in which staff have felt increasingly emboldened to criticize and raise questions about the paper and, inevitably, the work of their own colleagues.

> Following Alexander’s blog post, several non-editorial newsroom staffers from the paper’s tech and product teams asked why he was being “doxxed,” and pointed out that the blogger’s cause was gaining traction on the computer-science site Hacker News. Another non-editorial staffer said they flagged the not-yet-published story for the paper’s customer care department “in case this snowballs into a spike in cancellations.” [italics mine]

Re:New York Times developers squabble over decision to doxx ... by hanklazard on Friday June 26, 2020 @07:54AM (#23650971)
yes, and i also think the description as a "computer-science site" is hilarious for some reason. maybe just that HN is so much more than that.
Re:New York Times developers squabble over decision to doxx ... by Balgair on Friday June 26, 2020 @02:21PM (#23655199)
Just be glad they don't call HN a 'deep dark message board where notorious hackers and the Silicon Valley elite come to discuss politics and religion on a global scale' or 'some weeb hacker site'
Re:New York Times developers squabble over decision to doxx ... by kreetx on Friday June 26, 2020 @06:50AM (#23650583)
A bit, yes. :) Some recognition on the very mainstream media.