Re:Perceptions of musical octaves are learned, not wired in ...
by dr_dshiv on Thursday June 25, 2020 @09:51AM
(#23640728)
Also worthwhile to point out that brainwave coupling is based on "octaves" (i.e., roughly speaking -- gamma is double frequency of beta, which is double alpha, which is double theta, which is double delta....)
Pipes and strings are better modelled by a 1D resonator, which is more likely to allow integer overtones - although they can still have inharmonic elements due to stiffness and - in the case of orchestral strings - rotation caused by the scraping bow.
None of which changes the fact that octaves are primary in any instrument which produces a range of pitches with a clear and reasonably sustained fundamental.
In fact researchers rely on the concept of pitch chroma/pitch class to distinguish between absolute frequency. Humans reliably hear the octave/not octave distinction, as do some animals. Obviously the animals aren't musically trained.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5479468/
But it's not enough to say that "octave perceptions are learned." In this experiment it's more likely that octave use is learned in musical contexts.
There's a huge difference between saying that someone can't hear octave relationships at all, and that they can hear them perfectly clearly, they just don't find them culturally relevant - perhaps because their music theory is built on a grid of absolute pitches, and not on a repeating pattern of pitches.