Re:If Earth Was 50% Larger, We Might Be Stuck Here
by lxmorj on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @12:00AM
(#23609784)
Right? A balloon first stage seems like an obvious work-around...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:If Earth Was 50% Larger, We Might Be Stuck Here
by perl4ever on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @12:39AM
(#23609980)
Insert xkcd about how the difficulty in getting to orbit is speed not altitude.
This is all the more true about a larger planet than earth.
Sure, you might have a thicker atmosphere, but that's an additional challenge. Needing a balloon (if it made sense, I couldn't do the calculation) would be a reflection of the difficulty above and beyond the increased orbital velocity that is the basic problem.
Re:If Earth Was 50% Larger, We Might Be Stuck Here
by lxmorj on Thursday June 25, 2020 @11:31PM
(#23648396)
Well sure, but the majority of your energy spent is fighting to get up to speed while in the atmosphere. A balloon or dirigible or some buoyancy play should be able to get you to a certain atmospheric density regardless of planetary gravity. That cuts the bottom off of the rocket equation pyramid and reduces drag immensely at your 'starting' point.