Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”

Re:Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “a... by dvtrn on Monday June 22, 2020 @12:43PM (#23602331)

I imagine the mods have a fairly finely tuned sense of which threads will turn into a shitstorm and don't give a fuck about pre-emptively killing them.

How do we feel about pre-emptive moderation? Is it warranted? Is it warranted every time? Only certain topics?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “a... by dageshi on Monday June 22, 2020 @12:49PM (#23602431)

Ultimately the mods are volunteers, they get to do what they want?

More precisely I would imagine they don't care about facilitating/refereeing culture wars inside their subs, cause lord only knows how much work that would be.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “a... by dvtrn on Monday June 22, 2020 @12:52PM (#23602468)

Well sure, they get to do whatever they want, you're right. It's their community they're moderating. We agree.

That wasn't what I was asking-however.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “a... by dageshi on Monday June 22, 2020 @01:01PM (#23602619)

I think it's probably warranted some of the time, mostly around topics where much heat but little light is generated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “a... by tekknik on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @08:48AM (#23613142)

How does this method avoid the moderators implicit bias? Unless we get actual sitting judges how can these people be neutral and not impose their bias on what light is?

[ Parent | on HN ]