News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon’s enforcement failures leave open a back door to b... by ceejayoz on Friday June 19, 2020 @11:51AM (#23575646)
No one said those things are illegal to possess or sell.

They're saying Amazon prohibits their sale, but doesn't effectively enforce that rule.

> They’re included among 38 pages of third-party seller rules and prohibitions for its U.S. marketplace.

> Yet an investigation by The Markup found that Amazon fails to properly enforce that list, allowing third-party sellers to put up and sell banned items.

Re:Amazon’s enforcement failures leave open a back door to b... by E5JBK7UJPT on Friday June 19, 2020 @03:01PM (#23577785)
> but doesn't effectively enforce that rule.

We don't know how effective their enforcement of the rules are. Maybe 99.9% of listings for banned items are properly removed and what we see are just 0.1% of a very large number. I would say 99.9% is a rate that most people would say is effective. Would you say the rule enforcement is effective if it catches exactly 100% of violators?

Re:Amazon’s enforcement failures leave open a back door to b... by fortran77 on Friday June 19, 2020 @11:52AM (#23575666)
I never said they were. (Although they may be in some places.) What I'm saying is it's very useful to have tools to get into a locked car or to pick a lock. Who hasn't locked himself out?
Re:Amazon’s enforcement failures leave open a back door to b... by ceejayoz on Friday June 19, 2020 @11:54AM (#23575687)
I'm saying whether or not they're useful, the point of the article is that Amazon purports not to permit them, but doesn't police their listings well.