News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth (2003) by trasz on Friday June 19, 2020 @07:54AM (#23573416)
They were feudal country in the fifties. That suggests being rather slow at social changes.

Also, "figures show that since the early 1960s, the Tibetan population has been increasing, probably for the first time for centuries" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Tibet).

Re:Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth (2003) by ginko on Friday June 19, 2020 @07:57AM (#23573440)
My guess is that an independent Tibet would have developed at about the same pace as neighboring Bhutan, which abolished slavery in 1958 and turned into a constitutional monarchy in 2005.

There are still human rights issues in Bhutan, but it's a far cry from where they were 70 years ago.

Re:Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth (2003) by trasz on Friday June 19, 2020 @08:43AM (#23573898)
Okay. Is there some comparison of living conditions between modern day Bhutan and Tibet?
Re:Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth (2003) by ginko on Friday June 19, 2020 @08:59AM (#23574039)
I guess such comparisons are hard to make and bound to be subjective.

According to [1] Bhutan's HDI was 6.17 in 2018, while according to [2] the regional HDI of Tibet was 5.85. So at the very least they're not particularly far apart from each other.

[1] http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/BTN

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_administrative_divisio...