News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic by tgv on Friday June 19, 2020 @02:14AM (#23571526)
Like flat earth and anti-vax? To me, it seems more obvious that that's the effect of attention and manipulation in media, both "classic" and social.

A suspicious attitude institutions has always existed: from the government down to the grocer, who pushes the scales down while weighing. The more the attention is drawn towards it, the greater the suspicion gets, and I feel that especially divisive attention feeds suspicion. When behavior of an institution, such as the Trump administration, is not beyond reproach, it feeds the attention cycle.

Re:Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic by ceilingcorner on Friday June 19, 2020 @02:25AM (#23571588)
The Flat Earth thing makes no sense to me, but regarding Anti-Vax: again, not defending them, but it’s trivially easy to find examples of governments (worldwide) deceptively giving people medicine which had a negative effect on their health, whether as experimentation, sterilization, or otherwise. The fact that vaccines are scientifically known to be safe is just lost in the noise.

I attribute the rise of conspiracy theories to an overabundance of information; doing the research on each individual topic is just overwhelming to the average person and subsequently a simplistic conspiracy theory has appeal.

Re:Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic by api on Friday June 19, 2020 @11:25AM (#23575403)
My pet theory on the flat Earth is that it's been pushed in order to compile lists of extremely gullible people by scraping social media so that these lists can be used later. For what? Who knows. Targets of scams, marketing, propaganda...
Re:Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic by bcrl on Friday June 19, 2020 @09:27PM (#23580706)
Nah, some AI just figured out it was an easy way to get more clicks on YouTube.
Re:Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic by tgv on Friday June 19, 2020 @02:37AM (#23571655)
I mention flat earth and anti-vax, because they are conspiracy theories that are not obviously driven by the government's behavior.
Re:Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic by ceilingcorner on Friday June 19, 2020 @02:48AM (#23571738)
I am not too familiar with either, but in my view they are definitely associated with ‘authority’ whether then be mainstream media, government, institutions, etc.
Re:Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic by tgv on Friday June 19, 2020 @02:54AM (#23571783)
Sure, but where I live, these are still held in high regard, yet anti-vax and flat earth spread here too. I don't think the institutions are the direct drivers of conspiracies.

Perhaps I should have made clearer that it was in particular the word "direct" that I was responding too, not the fact that unethical or shady behavior from a government can trigger long-lasting distrust.