I always find it amusing when the boundaries for monopoly are drawn around the set of the customers of a company. By that logic, every company is a monopoly! United Airlines has a monopoly on every customers that flies in one of their airplanes. How dare they only offer a certain brand of snack! They’re extorting their customers who have no choice!
The iPhone has somewhere between 80-90% market share with them.
Even outside of teens, they're at close to 50% and you don't need a strict majority in order to have control over the market. That's why, legally, you don't need a strict majority to be considered a monopoly.
Next.
You can read about it here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_power#Measurement
And as much as you might wish it to be so, anti-trust courts are not going to take seriously an argument that Apple is a monopoly because you find a demographic (teens) that they have a larger market share in. Again, you can easily slice and dice markets by customer demographics to make any company a monopoly.
Next.
They can absolutely be sued for this. Look it up.
Here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/13/us/politics/supreme-court...
It has nothing to do with your bizarre argument that because Apple has greater than 50% market share in the demographic of "teens", they're a monopoly and the government must step in. Does that also apply for a company who has a monopoly on "27-year-old web designers in Brooklyn who own a dog"?
I'm done with this conversation. You clearly have an axe to grind against Apple, and it's leading you to avoid arguing in good faith.
Thank you for acknowledging the exact point that I just made?
> It has nothing to do with your bizarre argument ...
I didn't say that it was because of my argument. My demographic argument was simply a point of interest. And actually, you can disregard it and still know that Apple is the largest single manufacturer of smartphones in the US and they’ll soon surpass the 50% mark based on their trajectory and the new $399 iPhone. Samsung is a distant second.
How bizarre is that??
> I'm done with this conversation. You clearly have an axe to grind against Apple...
Pffft. Okay. Why shouldn't I have an axe to grind? And while we're at it - you're clearly apologizing for Apple where they deserve none. Defending a company that is basically the fucking China of tech with their Great Wall of bullshit isn't a real good look. You're going to be on the wrong side of history when this bears out.
But please, do stop arguing because nothing you say will make what Apple is doing right. Even if the law were on their side, which it's not, we'd have reason enough here to make new laws that target these essential devices with new regulations. So, change your attitude, get on the correct side and stop defending your favorite corporation.
OTOH how many viable mobile platforms do you have? Whopping two (on the world scale). And one of them is not playing fairly. (Edit: And the other is not playing fairly either in some other aspects.)
This is a corrected version.
I like pepsi (Visa Credit card), others like other drinks, such as coca-cola (Amex Credit card), or Sprite (Mastercard Debit card), or Fanta (Prepaid card), etc.
I want to walk into a shop which allows me to drink any of the above legitimate drinks, but nothing dodgy, such as that toxic brew which someone has prepared in their dirty garage which makes people throw up (e.g. Bitcoin). So instead of having to verify each drink myself I want to go to a shop where this has been done for me by a gatekeeper. If that gatekeeper forces all payment options through their own gate (Apple Pay) in order to make sure that there is no funny business going on, then I am 100% supportive of it. You can still have you coca cola if you want and I my pepsi. Just don't ask me to drink something which looks like pepsi but could be some other dog shit (allow other payment gateways which are not apple pay and all sorts of dodge shit can happen then).
That's what I do to avoid giving Apple money.
They don't even allow competing browser engines. Chrome, Firefox etc on iOS are just wrappers around Safari.
There's no other option. It's not possible to sideload apps. Developers are obliged to use appstore.
Regarding payments, the developers are not only obliged to have a way to pay with Apple (would be okay), they are obliged to not have another way.
Your argument is "I like pepsi, therefore I'm fine with the fact that no one can buy coca-cola".