News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pyrrhic Victory by chrisco255 on Wednesday June 17, 2020 @04:39AM (#23549206)
Well yeah I think even I bought into it at some point. The line would go "as long as our debt to GDP ratio stays relatively steady, we'll be ok"...but what happens if another great depression happens and the growth dips 10-15% and flat lines from there? Then your debt will grow faster than your GDP and eventually it will crush the economy. All the uncomfortable conversations about complex trade-offs and budget cuts have got to occur and nobody is wanting to have that convo.

I think it started in the 60s with the Vietnam War, the Space program and Johnson's great society programs. And then Nixon took us off the gold peg, and we were free to print as much as we wanted.

MMT is pretty scary to me. It's never really been tested long term at scale and mainly exists as a theory. But I know that's the end game for the Fed and that's the trajectory we're on.

Re:Pyrrhic Victory by RobertoG on Wednesday June 17, 2020 @08:48AM (#23550725)
The public debt is just the accumulate of past deficits. If the Fed is owning the debt you are paying interest to yourself. The only risk is inflation and this is not something to be worried at the moment.

MMT is only a description of how the systems work. But if by "test it", you mean that the Central Bank is backing the public debt, Japan have been doing for, at least, twenty years.

Re:Pyrrhic Victory by joejerryronnie on Wednesday June 17, 2020 @12:23PM (#23553229)
Why do you think we maintain the world’s largest military by orders of magnitude?