News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kevin Rose on the sources of Digg's problems by ojbyrne on Monday March 21, 2011 @11:49PM (#2353018)
Everyone makes mistakes in the early days of startups and digg was no exception.

If you're here, you've probably heard that Ycombinator favors determination over talent. I kept the site up and made things work with extremely limited resources.

Re:Kevin Rose on the sources of Digg's problems by philovivero on Monday March 28, 2011 @02:35PM (#2379466)
I'll second this. Owen's code was bad, because it was a large hack. It was a hack that worked. It was a hack because he had limited resources. He was ONE GUY coding, administering, doing everything up until something like 8 million users. That's not easy. The code was bad. So fucking what. It worked.

So with that, I say Owen is a good coder.

Kevin never understood tech. As Owen says, he's just a guy who looks good on TV. Now he's throwing all his good coders under the bus because he fucked Digg up with his grand V4 vision, and he's trying to point the blame at others besides himself.

"It's a low move, Kevin. Low move. We supported you. We took the blame when we fucked up. We never pointed the finger at you. So take the blame when you fuck up. Asshole."

Sincerely, The guy who kept DBs running for Digg for 4 years.

Re:Kevin Rose on the sources of Digg's problems by bvi on Tuesday March 22, 2011 @03:01AM (#2353426)
I'm not sure if you've done so already, but an AMA on reddit would be really neat if you're interested in talking about the early digg days.
Re:Kevin Rose on the sources of Digg's problems by pbhjpbhj on Saturday March 26, 2011 @11:46AM (#2372345)
>an AMA on reddit would be really neat

Sadly I can't see this going well. Reddit generally makes a big joke of how much Digg [supposedly] sucks. I don't think it would be generally a fulfilling experience for the AMA subject or most onlookers. YMMV.