News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court endorses gay, transgender worker prote... by enraged_camel on Monday June 15, 2020 @11:30AM (#23528367)
That ruling is dead on arrival now - it's only a matter of time before it's enjoined by federal district courts for directly contradicting the Supreme Court's interpretation of the relevant statutory language.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court endorses gay, transgender worker prote... by nkurz on Monday June 15, 2020 @01:35PM (#23530281)
I tried to resurrect your parent post, but it remains dead. So I'll ask here instead.

> I expected to be downvoted by conservatives, but not this fast.

What makes you think that you were downvoted by conservatives? You probably were downvoted by people who disagreed with you, but I don't see any particular reason to believe that they are conservative. As someone else pointed out downthread, it seems equally likely that you would be downvoted for saying something that could be construed as positive about Trump, or for that matter by someone who felt that you should be downvoted for even mentioning his name. Or maybe you are right. I'd love for downvotes to require some sort of public attribution of reasoning to avoid amplification of misunderstanding.

Re:U.S. Supreme Court endorses gay, transgender worker prote... by enraged_camel on Monday June 15, 2020 @07:27PM (#23534272)
How can "it just got harder for Trump to brag about his SCOTUS" picks be construed as a positive statement about Trump?