A Rule of Thumb: Pricing Should Be Simple

Re:A Rule of Thumb: Pricing Should Be Simple by isleyaardvark on Monday March 21, 2011 @08:51PM (#2352426)

More importantly the iPad's pricing is normal. The Nook, the Kindle, and the Xoom all come in different versions. People expect to pay different amounts for different hardware.

Nobody's doing what the NYT is doing. Netflix and Hulu are given as examples of content producers that have a simple pricing scheme over multiple devices. Lots of people use those services. The NYT pricing not only violates expectations for online content, it doesn't even seem typical for newspapers. Paying per 4 weeks instead of per month? Who has ever done that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Rule of Thumb: Pricing Should Be Simple by magicofpi on Tuesday March 22, 2011 @12:24AM (#2353107)

Yes, exactly. Perhaps the 4 weeks approach is to link it with the existing home delivery system (which is also calculated by week), but it sounds strange in practice.

I guess we'll see how it turns out, though. Maybe most customers won't actually mind these irregularities.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Rule of Thumb: Pricing Should Be Simple by chris_vannoy on Tuesday March 22, 2011 @06:38AM (#2353770)

Actually, my guess is the every-four-weeks bit is to goose revenue.

With monthly, you're getting paid 12 times a year. With every four weeks, you get paid 13 times.

It's a nifty little sales trick. Most people (including me) automatically round four weeks up to a month before thinking about it.

[ Parent | on HN ]