News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ZFS Removes References to Slavery. Parent comment

Re:ZFS Removes References to Slavery by sildur on Sunday June 14, 2020 @04:31PM (#23521056)
Because it’s easier to do a PR removing “slave” than to stop buying cheap things made in slave workshops.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZFS Removes References to Slavery by akerro on Sunday June 14, 2020 @04:36PM (#23521111)
>slave workshops.

It's "unpaid labour" now.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZFS Removes References to Slavery by ianleeclark on Sunday June 14, 2020 @04:42PM (#23521171)
Your boycott won't change anything. Is the only avenue of political change that you can see through the lens of individual consumption?

I genuinely don't see boycotts as powerful as others, so maybe I'm missing something here. However, shouldn't all avenues be taken if you're attempting to change something?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZFS Removes References to Slavery by banads on Sunday June 14, 2020 @04:47PM (#23521223)
>maybe I'm missing something here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boycott#Notable_boycotts

You're right that boycotts without leverage experience little success, but wrong if you think they are never successful.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZFS Removes References to Slavery by ianleeclark on Sunday June 14, 2020 @04:51PM (#23521253)
They only work if there is a power differential in-line with a block of consumers. I don't see ZFS developers as being a large enough block to affect anything, so their suggestion largely seems to be saying, "just do nothing instead."
[ Parent | on HN ]