Re:Amazon added a non-compete after the employee entered the...
by ghaff on Sunday June 14, 2020 @03:11PM
(#23520434)
It's also a chilling effect on many potential employers, especially small ones. When I was with a very small consulting firm, if someone interested in employment had a non-compete that was remotely relevant--or even an NC that wasn't very clearly not relevant--it was a very short discussion. Management just wasn't prepared to take even a small risk.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon added a non-compete after the employee entered the...
by Keverw on Sunday June 14, 2020 @08:40PM
(#23522736)
Interesting, wonder if some startup that didn't want to deal with the risk could just have a checkbox if you have a current in-effect non-compete agreement and just pipe those applications to /dev/null? Maybe if more companies were picky, people would fight back and try to negotiate better agreements... but then again probably depends on location, In Silicon Valley you can be a more picky potential employee compared to say rural Ohio.
Re:Amazon added a non-compete after the employee entered the...
by sukilot on Sunday June 14, 2020 @05:56PM
(#23521712)
How would you know? What would someone intentionally violating noncompete mention it to an employer?
Re:Amazon added a non-compete after the employee entered the...
by ghaff on Sunday June 14, 2020 @06:05PM
(#23521768)
Lying to a potential employer is a pretty bad first step. If I caught you doing it, say because someone mentioned it in a casual conversation, I'm going to fire you the same day. Same with lying on a resume even if it's utterly irrelevant multiple years later. It's also going to color any future professional interaction because you're an untrustworthy individual.
I'm pretty sure I don't want to be in a position where I'd be fired if a 10-year old lie came out.