News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Biohacking Lite by m0zg on Friday June 12, 2020 @07:05PM (#23504804)
Likewise, HFCS has about the same blend of sugars as honey, yet it is considered unhealthy and honey is considered healthy somehow. I'd like someone to explain how that works.
Re:Biohacking Lite by dreamcompiler on Saturday June 13, 2020 @09:05AM (#23509090)
Honey is only considered "healthy" by people who know nothing about nutrition but who think "natural" is automatically good [0]. Honey is no better for you than HFCS, but no worse either (except in infants because honey often contains botulism spores that infants cannot fight [1].)

[0] https://www.glycemic-index.org/high-fructose-corn-syrup-vs-s...

[1] https://www.fda.gov/food/alerts-advisories-safety-informatio...

Re:Biohacking Lite by RealityVoid on Sunday June 14, 2020 @09:54AM (#23517649)
The observation is, I think, based on the top level post mentioning:

> ban all added sugar, except (real) honey in reasonable proportions.

As if there is something "magic" about honey that makes it OK as opposed to all other sugars. There is not.

Re:Biohacking Lite by rsanek on Friday June 12, 2020 @08:29PM (#23505442)
FWIW, I don't think honey is considered healthy. In any nutrition recommendation I'm familiar with, it is considered a part of added/free sugars, aka something to limit.
Re:Biohacking Lite by manmal on Saturday June 13, 2020 @01:01AM (#23506910)
Maybe, if HFCS were consumed in equal amounts as honey, it would also be considered healthy. Hormesis is a strange thing - too much of a good thing will turn it into a bad thing.