(he did leave for a footnote that for examples of pornographic propaganda one would have to visit archives at an address in Washington DC; guess that'd be the 1950's talking)
Additionally, does it merit discriminating between offensive and defensive psy-ops? Might there, for example, be government-controled bots injecting wholesomememes content into the feeds of depressed government employees? Does Twitter have a different obligation in that context?
That doesn't seem to have stopped them from banning accounts posting in Chinese.
> government-controled bots injecting wholesomememes content into the feeds of depressed government employees
That would still be "coordinated inauthentic behavior".
In the small towns around the Seattle area there have been multiple false claims of antifa planned attacks, leading to lots of people pulling out their guns. Here's one where someone visiting from out of town took pics of kids walking around and made wild accusations that they were 'outsiders' who were threatening - yet he was the outsider who was making up threats. [3]
1. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/twitter-takes-down-was...
2. https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/06/01/antifa_...
3. https://www.issaquahreporter.com/news/how-a-man-from-califor...
Biden, Trump and various members of both camps command more than enough attention through their own Twitter accounts.
Likewise pushing political agendas is largely superfluous given you can just lobby politicians directly without needed public support.