Re:Someone paid $2.6M in fees to move $134 worth of cryptocu...
by nytf3 on Thursday June 11, 2020 @01:40PM
(#23491291)
im not sure why this is being downvoted. this is clearly the case here.
the user and the miner are colluding (or the same party). the user does not broadcast their tx publicly, only sending it to the colluding miner. since fees have no utxo history, this essentially launders the eth
the user and the miner are colluding (or the same party). the user does not broadcast their tx publicly, only sending it to the colluding miner. since fees have no utxo history, this essentially launders the eth