I find your understanding of this rather contrived given that your constitution has nothing to do with me.

Your ip laws on the other hand, well, they stretch far and wide around countries that would rather have nothing to do with you.

I would prefer, if youre going to refute my claims, you at least acknowledge them.

Like, the fact ip law had a net benefit to society when they were conceived. But have since been twisted and applied dishonestly.

Can anyone tell me what the real damage would be if we limited copyright terms to one year? And what would be the real benefit to society at large to freely access information?

Your concerns about the effect of America's IP laws is a totally different issue. Your government presumably either believes that IP law is a net benefit today, or else wants something else that america had enough to hold their nose and make a deal. There are some political steps you can take to try to reverse that scenario but I'm afraid IA's actions here have no bearing on that. They can't possibly help you at all.

As to the rest of what you said, does it have merit? I don't know. What I do know is that IA will be worse off after this lawsuit is done.