Re:Cω
by mturmon on Monday March 21, 2011 @01:22AM
(#2348591)
You know what, you're right (and if I may add, on both counts ;-).
The wikipedia page I referenced, loosely summarized, is referring to an ordinal number with the cardinality aleph-1. The plain omega that I should have referenced has cardinality aleph-0.
Unfortunately, the ordinal I wanted does not have its own wikipedia page. WTF? Merely countable is not notable enough?
Re:Cω
by barista on Monday March 21, 2011 @01:54AM
(#2348641)
Some research project about a new language and the top comments are about how weird its name is and how the character looks like a butt? I'm speechless.
The wikipedia page I referenced, loosely summarized, is referring to an ordinal number with the cardinality aleph-1. The plain omega that I should have referenced has cardinality aleph-0.
Unfortunately, the ordinal I wanted does not have its own wikipedia page. WTF? Merely countable is not notable enough?