News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cω. Parent comment

Re:Cω by cosbynator on Sunday March 20, 2011 @11:08PM (#2348242)
Not to be too pedantic, but little omega is not the first uncountable ordinal (it is countable by definition), it is the first infinite one.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cω by mturmon on Monday March 21, 2011 @01:22AM (#2348591)
You know what, you're right (and if I may add, on both counts ;-).

The wikipedia page I referenced, loosely summarized, is referring to an ordinal number with the cardinality aleph-1. The plain omega that I should have referenced has cardinality aleph-0.

Unfortunately, the ordinal I wanted does not have its own wikipedia page. WTF? Merely countable is not notable enough?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cω by barista on Monday March 21, 2011 @01:54AM (#2348641)
Some research project about a new language and the top comments are about how weird its name is and how the character looks like a butt? I'm speechless.
[ Parent | on HN ]