News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition by Spooky23 on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @10:31PM (#23484659)
If they can turn the knob, why wouldn’t they? This stuff isn’t admissible in court, and you can sweep for potential matches to follow up on.

If the default is 80, most will be 80. The SE may say “I’m told to inform you that you should use 99.”, but I’m sure he is winking.

Re:A one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition by perl4ever on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @11:39PM (#23484996)
Wouldn't it be more likely that they say "ok, we can interview/investigate/whatever X number of people" and then they adjust the threshold to produce that number? If 80% gives them 10,000 hits and 99% gives them one or none, then nobody is going to just go with either setting.
Re:A one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition by Spooky23 on Thursday June 11, 2020 @08:20AM (#23488018)
I'd guess with the potato quality of facial pictures from incidents security or phone cameras, you might want lower confidence matches to get outcomes out of lousy pictures.