News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Audio Engineers Built a Shield to Deflect Police Sound Ca... by aaron695 on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @03:43PM (#23481186)
> permanent injury across a crowd

This needs a real world citation.

Wiki seems to me missing it too.

"This article is missing information about non-loudspeaker / anti-personnel uses and hearing damage. (June 2019)"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Range_Acoustic_Device

Then, if there are any actual facts not political facts, we can talk about refusing police access to non-lethal weapons and only giving access to guns and what that might mean.

Re:Audio Engineers Built a Shield to Deflect Police Sound Ca... by ashtonkem on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @04:04PM (#23481415)
The police already have guns, lots of them.

The problem with less lethal crowd control tools is that police use them in situations where they would never use a real firearm, creating injuries that wouldn’t happen otherwise. This is really problematic when the police are angry at the protestors, as it gives them a way to inflict revenge pain without the PR fallout of opening fire with rifles.

There is evidence that even on a regular basis, tasers have not replaced firearms, but instead have replaced other means of de-escalation and constraint. The result is that more americans might be dead because we’ve handed out tasers to cops without a second thought.