Re:Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
by anticensor on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @11:35AM
(#23478250)
Why not package QUIC in IP directly without UDP in between?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
by jlouis on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @12:57PM
(#23479324)
UDP is as clean as you can get it. It is more or less free of any overhead. And networks know UDP already. A new IP protocol is far more likely to be rejected in the network.
Re:Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
by tptacek on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @04:18PM
(#23481583)
This, exactly; it's the actual reason UDP exists. It's a design smell for anything to ask for a new IP protocol number.
Re:Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
by sagichmal on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @11:43AM
(#23478379)
A protocol separate to UDP and TCP altogether would suffer from middlebox interference problems.
Re:Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
by anticensor on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @11:53AM
(#23478504)
Aaaa, you mean the problem of -smart- stupid pipes. These do and will exist all the time and this is an opportunity for them to realise how detrimental they do is to Internet.