Re:Wikipedia Lost 3B Organic Search Visits to Google in 2019
by garyclarke27 on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @10:56AM
(#23477691)
I would rather Wikipedia took some advertising, rather than it’s begging pop ups which have become more intrusive and irritating recently.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia Lost 3B Organic Search Visits to Google in 2019
by sjwright on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @10:59AM
(#23477740)
That literally makes no sense. You'd rather a rectangle telling you to consume sugar than a rectangle asking if you can support an organisation that provides a service you use?
Re:Wikipedia Lost 3B Organic Search Visits to Google in 2019
by Sharlin on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @11:04AM
(#23477805)
Ads are easier to block, or just ignore as a fact of life. Donation requests might cause irritating cognitive dissonance.
Re:Wikipedia Lost 3B Organic Search Visits to Google in 2019
by softwarejosh on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @11:11AM
(#23477916)
then you should be asking for a paid membership
Re:Wikipedia Lost 3B Organic Search Visits to Google in 2019
by Sharlin on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @11:21AM
(#23478067)
The point is, of course, that you don’t really want to pay for it but feel sort of guilty if reminded that keeping it running costs money. Textbook example of cognitive dissonance.