Re:Britain has gone two months without burning coal to gener...
by jcheng on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @05:49PM
(#23471320)
Look at the size of those excavators--the bulldozer in the lower left of the image looks like a forgotten child's toy by comparison!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garzweiler_surface_mine#/media...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Britain has gone two months without burning coal to gener...
by Someone on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @08:32PM
(#23472594)
What’s more, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucket-wheel_excavator has the same photo, and says “Note the 90-ton CAT front loader at lower left for size comparison”
⇒ chances are a normal-sized bulldozer is half the height of that one.
Re:Britain has gone two months without burning coal to gener...
by dmoy on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @07:39PM
(#23472210)
That is bagger288, it weighs over 10Gg and it's like 100m tall or something
Re:Britain has gone two months without burning coal to gener...
by TwoHeadedBeast on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @07:45PM
(#23472252)
I love the metric system and all that, but perhaps 10,000 tonnes might be a better way of expressing the mass of the digger.
Re:Britain has gone two months without burning coal to gener...
by eeh on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @08:36PM
(#23472614)
Yes. Also, tonne is accepted for use in SI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#...