It seems like it would be a lot easier to say "Bob Martin is not my cup of tea." He's not mine either. I've read a bunch of his stuff. Some good ideas, some I definitely don't agree with. I don't love his writing style.

But you said "explain why we don't like Robert Martin", which to some extent says its a problem with the man himself, not his point of view on software defects. Starting your post that way undermines your conclusion and makes it seem as if you're post-hoc rationalizing your dislike of the mine rather than talking about software methods.