News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Potential organized fraud in ACM/IEEE computer architecture conferences. Parent comment

Re:Potential organized fraud in ACM/IEEE computer architectu... by dependenttypes on Monday June 08, 2020 @11:26PM (#23463368)
From the link that someone else posted in this thread http://pbzcnepu.net/isca/timeline.html

> Only one e-mail response is received. That PC member said the first author of a paper has no right to withdraw an article due to methodology concerns and that if an advisor says publish, they should just publish without complaint.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Potential organized fraud in ACM/IEEE computer architectu... by anjc on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @11:35AM (#23467529)
Well thanks for that, I'm confused about the relevance of an 'advisor' to a paper from the perspective of the PC or publisher, or how they would even determine who an advisor is. Do IEEE/ACM have rules for this or is this part of the alleged fraud?
[ Parent | on HN ]