Re:Patent on displaying SQL data in HTML, granted to IBM in ...
by wolco on Saturday June 06, 2020 @09:40AM
(#23439093)
Does anyone have a good software patent story? Where a small company was able to use for good or to fight off a bigger player.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Patent on displaying SQL data in HTML, granted to IBM in ...
by unlord on Saturday June 06, 2020 @09:50AM
(#23439157)
You may be interested in reading the license page for the royalty-free Opus audio codec:
https://opus-codec.org/license/
Full disclosure, I am a member of the Xiph.Org Foundation.
Re:Patent on displaying SQL data in HTML, granted to IBM in ...
by loeg on Saturday June 06, 2020 @12:06PM
(#23440115)
Importantly, Xiph.org is a 501(c)(3).
Re:Patent on displaying SQL data in HTML, granted to IBM in ...
by pnw_hazor on Saturday June 06, 2020 @12:09PM
(#23440142)
I know a few, at least one asserted one of their few patents against IBM to force a licensing deal -- reversing the direction of the money to the startup instead of them paying IBM.
If a startup has some decent patents, they get to have a conversation with companies like IBM that come calling. Otherwise, they have to roll over.
Basically, when the IBMs of the world come around demanding a license, you show IBM they are infringing on your patent.
In general patents are business assets or business tools. They are important for valuation, among other things.
Re:Patent on displaying SQL data in HTML, granted to IBM in ...
by brlewis on Saturday June 06, 2020 @09:56AM
(#23439203)
Does a crime become good if the victim is big and the perpetrator is small?
Re:Patent on displaying SQL data in HTML, granted to IBM in ...
by ineedasername on Saturday June 06, 2020 @02:40PM
(#23441365)
It's roughly the military equivalent of the enemy having their artillery emplacements overrun and then turned against their own troops. Size of the respective fighting forces is irrelevant, it's simply a useful tactic. Of course if the overrun emplacements were part of a large, belligerent force agitating a smaller force without cause, there may seem to be a certain justice in using their weapons against them. It doesn't make the subsequent killing "good", but it may help discourage further aggression against strategically disadvantaged but tactically superior forces.