Note that I'm not suggesting we disband them. I am just trying to follow the logic.
This is pretty common in lots of things so it's pretty easy to understand. You have an aim you want to achieve (peace), you have a tool that does not achieve that (current police), so you discard the tool and get a new tool.
According to HN, everything is impossible. In reality? Going to space didn't have to cost a billion a launch, electric cars weren't impossible, and we can have fibre internet.
For every one of these things, the HN gestalt is that "they're a complex interconnected system influenced by thousands of different external forces". Welp, guess what. Alexander's cut the Gordian Knot. It's clear now that everything is possible and y'all are just hyper risk averse.
> According to HN, everything is impossible. In reality? Going to space didn't have to cost a billion a launch, electric cars weren't impossible, and we can have fibre internet.
Not exactly. It's more like the status quo that serves them is impossible to change because they don't want it changed.
Stereotypical HN likes space and electric cars and hates anything that may disrupt their comfortable sociopolitical station.
1 - https://www.joincampaignzero.org/