Re:More than half of American retailers didn't pay their ren...
by airza on Thursday June 04, 2020 @05:41PM
(#23422222)
It's certainly more feasible to rent if you don't have the money to buy a house, which is why every single renter i know is doing do. I'm just not sure why this is necessary or a valuable economic innovation that justifies the rent paid.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:More than half of American retailers didn't pay their ren...
by toast0 on Thursday June 04, 2020 @06:41PM
(#23422840)
Rentals are a useful innovation because the transaction is beneficial for both parties.
The leasor turns their large investment into a stream of payments, and the leasee turns their stream of payments into use of a large investment without having to make such an investment and without needing to have the capability to make that investment.
Avoiding making a large investment in property makes it easier for the leasee to move if needed, since there aren't significant costs to unwind a lease like there are to unwinding property ownership.
Re:More than half of American retailers didn't pay their ren...
by em500 on Thursday June 04, 2020 @06:10PM
(#23422582)
You're not sure why it's a valuable economic innovation that people who don't have the money to buy a house can rent one? What alternative are you suggesting, that they should get a house for free?