News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Road Less Traveled to Fusion Energy?. Parent comment

Re:The Road Less Traveled to Fusion Energy? by peterwoerner on Thursday June 04, 2020 @12:15PM (#23418482)
The people working on fusion generally think it is a solved problem. Namely, fusion is a heat source and we have numerous technologies which can convert a heat source to generate electricity a number of which can be connected to the fusion generator with "some engineering". That's why they talk about the parts which aren't yet solved.

I used to work with under a guy who worked on ITER, they were all aware of that part of the problem. It just wasn't part of the research they were engaged in.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Road Less Traveled to Fusion Energy? by varjag on Thursday June 04, 2020 @05:48PM (#23422298)
Generally, a layperson can safely assume that whatever problem they come up with on the spot, it has already been thought of by specialists as well.

True for any field you are not an expert in.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Road Less Traveled to Fusion Energy? by pfdietz on Thursday June 04, 2020 @05:45PM (#23422258)
The power density of ITER will be a horribly low 0.05 MW/m^3. Of course getting heat out is easier if there's so little heat being produced. But even then, the divertor at ITER will be challenging, as will dealing with heating from disruptions.
[ Parent | on HN ]