Another mitigation could be to specify allowed jump points (for example on big street crossings where the noise from cars would drown the drones' noise anyway).
If the difference is big enough it's like adding 0.01 to 10. You'd need a lot of drones to influence the total noise level noticeably.
From my experience (Fimi 8 SE ~ 300g drone) the drone is annoyingly loud at < 5meters, and becomes practicaly silent at >50 meters (at least I don't hear it anymore).
Though I reckon it's more likely that the constant noise of drones will drown out the traffic noise than the other way around. Not just because it's constant but also because it's LOUD.
It’s like when a car honks or someone whistles on the highway. There is a lot of noise, but the higher pitches are distinct.
That said I estimate a drone to be much louder than regular traffic, at least inside cities.
Now imagine that instead of returning something back to a central warehouse, Amazon could have the next customer pick it up or ship it nearby.
Hopefully boxes would not be needed for most of this, too. And any online store(s) could do this.
But I would also love if they could drone the package over to my roof if I wanted to.
It's also something only the fitter half of the population can realistically do.
I'd imagine there's some overlap of "people who race cars" and "people with aftermarket exhausts."
The critical issues of safety etc seem like a much bigger deal to me.
https://www.hollyspringsnc.us/DocumentCenter/View/23698/Soun...
So say 4m overhead 3m away (5m distance) you have ~80db
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/distance-attenuation
Add in the fact that you would feel the prop wash from it and it's going to be a fairly disturbing experience.
Complex problem for sure.
See, drones traded moving parts for the annoying whiny motors(but fixed in a rigid frame). If we are going to use moving parts anyway, there's helicopters.
Perhaps the lead-lag hinges can be elastomeric and one could purchase props with different fixed hinge stiffnesses for different amounts of noise dampening or frequency spread but perhaps at the cost of prop-speed change response? There'd probably have to be some compensatory mechanism in the flight- or motor-control software that'd be set for a given prop's hinge elasticity.
Of course, I am just idly speculating here on whether there's any benefit at all to any of my blather.
Rotor guards exist. They reduce efficiency, but if this is a major concern, it can be done.
Not much can be done today about the noise, short of not using drones and switching to helicopters, with larger, but slower moving blades (more difficult to guard them too).
There's someone in this thread saying that their F150 is less noisy than a drone. That is unlikely to be true, but the emitted frequencies are very different. A high pitch whine is, for whatever reason, very noticeable, compared to a lower pitch of similar amplitude. Think dentist drills.
(This of course is ignoring what happens if something fucks up and suddenly it has 1/8th of a second to decide to fly out of it or brake those giant swinging carbon fiber blades before they encounter human flesh. It's like a trolley problem on a trolley.).
No way. (IMHO of course)
(e.g
Video of a Matrice 600 with a payload of ~8lbs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jayVMmvLxOA
Even better, 25 lbs from 60' up lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jULQrdUTngM
)