Although I suppose that watching the movie knowing that it was actually shot in space will be novelty enough to keep the audience captivated, but that'll only work for the first few movies going through the hassle of doing it, then the novelty will wear off and I expect that at that point people will be back to using much cheaper, simple and flexible CGI.
Mostly spent focusing on pretty cramped quarters in a capsule. They figured out some ways to introduce drama. I think what might be the most stunning would be some of the exterior footage. I wonder whether that would introduce some sort of barrier-breaking in the mind when watching a film taking place above the earth knowing that the earth in the film is real footage in "real time" and not stock or CGI.
I just love when a super expensive taxpayer-funded space station (which is apparently also inefficient at science/$) gets used to make rich people richer.
https://www.nasa.gov/leo-economy/commercial-use/pricing-poli...
Regardless, love to see it happen.
Some examples: Axiom Space [1] plans to send three private passengers to the ISS on 2021, as well as adding their own commercial modules to the ISS. Tom Cruise seems pretty set on filming his next movie in space too [2].
Furthermore, if the Starship [3] project is successful, space is going to become _cheap_, perhaps even to the point that anyone in the upper middle class might be able to purchase a ride.
Exciting times.
[1] https://www.axiomspace.com/
[2] https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/5/21248460/nasa-tom-cruise-m...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship