Re:Anders Tegnell defends Sweden's virus approach
by rob74 on Thursday June 04, 2020 @03:24AM
(#23413656)
First, it was not "promised" as an apocalypse (for an apocalypse, the death rate would have to be much higher) - the intention behind the restrictions was simply to not overwhelm the medical system, so that everyone that needs treatment should be able to get it. Second, the restrictions are the reason why the situation didn't turn out (even) worse than it did, but some people just fail to see that (or intentionally ignore it)...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Anders Tegnell defends Sweden's virus approach
by nostromo on Thursday June 04, 2020 @03:41AM
(#23413783)
> the intention behind the restrictions was simply to not overwhelm the medical system
This is my point. When the medical system wasn’t overwhelmed, the restrictions should have been eased, but weren’t in many places. The goal posts were moved dramatically.
Re:Anders Tegnell defends Sweden's virus approach
by thomasz on Thursday June 04, 2020 @04:16PM
(#23421225)
The window between an overwhelmed health care system and a suppressed epidemic is extremely thin. We simply cannot dial in exactly the right reproduction number to get this over with in a reasonable time frame without overloading the available hospitals. Even the Swedish approach has caused massive economic damages, and even then they are still in the early stages of their epidemic.